Search for: "Ames v. Baker" Results 221 - 240 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by James Bickford
”  And, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Stewart Baker analyzes the December oral argument in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:04 am by Stewart Baker
I am excited about Apple's progress in devising a blood glucose monitor that could go into a watch. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
  I would greatly welcome any corrections or other substantive reactions, especially since I am teaching these questions to my students this semester! [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
09:29 AM September 05, 2008 from twitterrific David Keltner discussing City of Keller v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
In Kowaliw Baker J said at 76,644:As a statement of general principle, I am firmly of the view that financial losses incurred by parties or either of them in the course of the marriage whether such losses result from a joint or several liability, should be shared by them (although not necessarily equally) except in the following circumstances: (a) where one of the parties has embarked upon a course of conduct designed to reduce or minimise the effective value or worth of… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Constitution by depriving same-sex couples of the fundamental right to marry, including recognition of their lawful, out-of-state marriages; (2) whether a state impermissibly infringes upon same-sex couples’ fundamental right to interstate travel by refusing to recognize their lawful out-of-state marriages; and (3) whether this Court’s summary dismissal in Baker v. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:47 am by Andrew Delaney
”SCOV writes a nice concise summary of the last 15 years going from Baker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am by Rick Hasen
Rather than a full-throated defense of traditional marriage (a la Justice Scalia), Judge Smith hangs his hat on two fundamental, almost procedural points: first, that the 9th Circuit is bound by an earlier summary affirmance of the Supreme Court in the Baker case [UPDATE: As a reader pointed out to me--on this point I am mistaken. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:57 am by emagraken
 In rejecting the application Master Baker provided the following helpful reasons: [13] I am not satisfied at all that in these circumstances, with these facts and history, that a second IME is justified. [read post]