Search for: "Application of American Broadcasting Companies" Results 221 - 240 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
While this statement is generally true for and applicable to both the executive and legislation branches, as sagely summarized by Justice Moore over fifty years ago, it can not be said to apply nearly as much to the judiciary. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
In the present case, Dominion sought to extend the liability for allegedly defamatory statements published by the Fox News Network to its parent company, Fox Corporation, and a wholly owned subsidiary of Fox Corporation, the Fox Broadcasting Company. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:45 am by Jonathan Bailey
ASCAP – American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:49 pm
In the US Democratic and Republican politicians bickered on Wednesday over whether to spend more money helping Americans get analog TVs ready for a 2009 shift to all-digital broadcasts. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:56 am by Jonathan Cohen
  To list just a few: The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act of 2021 (R. 1735; S. 673) would enable print, broadcast, or digital news companies to collectively negotiate with online content distributors (see our article here when this bill was introduced). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by Laura Sandwell
Deutsche Bahn AG & Ors v Morgan Crucible Company plc, heard 11 – 12 March 2014. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:44 am by INFORRM
RomaniaDecision Date: March 1, 2022 The Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that the state of Romania breached the right to privacy of the applicant when its domestic courts argued that a company was not civilly liable for broadcasting on television an interview of the applicant, then aged eleven, without the consent of her parents. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In 1967 Ltd & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 3444 (Ch) (23 October 2014), another UK court held that foreign BitTorrent websites that offered services to UK users was subject to UK copyright laws. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:22 pm by Larry Downes
 That means that specific ranges of spectrum more-or-less arbitrarily set aside for a particular application remains forever set aside for that application, unless and until the FCC undertakes a rulemaking to reassign it. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm by admin
The “content” is – well – a competing application. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/CvfBOaH4zP -> Tech Companies Defeat 'Abstract' Acacia Software Patent http://t.co/ekCSSlM9xF -> Cowardy custody order as copyright is ruled partnership property http://t.co/pyd8iJFvJQ -> Copyright Re-sale Rights for Canada? [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:05 am by Sheppard Mullin
A general notice on the company website will suffice provided the requisite contact information is included. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:32 pm
In court documents, Cutler says she can't pay her American Express bill, legal fees and student loans. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:57 am by JakeMcGowan
* NY Times: Broadcasters Circle Wagons Against a TV Streaming Upstart [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 2:29 am by rhapsodyinbooks
He is not only a former Distinguished Visiting Fellow in American History at Mount Vernon, but also a journalist and broadcaster, which I think gives him a good feel for how to present history in an entertaining way. [read post]