Search for: "Arthrex Inc"
Results 221 - 240
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 9:26 am
Citing its recent rulings on this issue in Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:37 pm
Cir. 2015); ePlus, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:31 pm
Chevron Oronite Company LLC (post-arthrex timing issue) Utility: Hu v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:38 am
Medical device manufacturers: Arthrex, Inc. paid $16 million to settle our client’s qui tam claims that it defrauded Medicare by paying illegal remuneration to an orthopedic surgeon to induce him to purchase, order, or recommend the purchasing or ordering of Arthrex medical devices. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
MacroSolve, Inc., No. 15-1369 (district court’s too-high burden) Globus Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
Arthrex, Inc., which held that, under Article II of the Constitution, decisions issued by certain inferior officers exercising adjudicatory authority must be subject to review by a politically accountable official, such as an officer appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Arthrex, Inc. , 141 S. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am
Arthrex, Inc., which ruled that the PTO director may review and overrule the decisions of the patent judges of the PTAB. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
While there, she prosecuted many notable FCA cases including several qui tam cases against National Medicare Care, Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Sharp Memorial Hospital, Inc., 264 Cal. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:24 pm
The impact of this rule is already being seen at the Federal Circuit, such as in Arthrex, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
The Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits offering or accepting kickbacks intended to generate health care business. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am
Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
Constitutionality of the PTAB On October 31, 2019, the Federal Circuit released a landmark opinion in Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Body Blue Inc.; Synergism Arithmetically Compounded Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
The Federal Circuit rejected this argument based on dicta in Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
