Search for: "BEAM v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
A New York Probate Lawyer said the plaintiff was performing his work while standing on a makeshift scaffold, which consisted of two layers of 2-inch-by-10-inch boards, supported at the ends by beams which were part of the structure being built. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
As plaintiff was removing beams from the level above, and dropping them onto the deck, the deck broke, causing him to fall and sustain brain injuries. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
As plaintiff was removing beams from the level above, and dropping them onto the deck, the deck broke, causing him to fall and sustain brain injuries. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:55 am by Brendan Kevenides
 Though not a bike lighting case, the First District Appellate Court (Chicago is in the First District) considered this issue in Savage v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week, in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:26 pm by Kirk Jenkins
­-- Where the I-beam on a bridge the plaintiffs were constructing collapsed and fell, did the plaintiffs state a triable issue of fact on (1) the "relationship" prong of duty to preserve evidence, and (2) the "foreseeability" prong of the duty, meaning that a reasonable person would have foreseen that the beam was material to a potential civil action? [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
The intensely private Souter, who hasn't made any extended public remarks in his state since retiring three years ago, looked abashed at first -- then beamed. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am by SHG
We've suffered Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
The concept of "victims' rights" was just then broadening its impact upon the criminal justice system, fueled by a United States Supreme Court decision styled Payne v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:56 am by Erik J. Heels
FunnyJunk: An Object Lesson In How To Deal With Litigious Internet Trolls (2012-06-12) The Oatmeal v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:00 am by Andrea K. Bjorklund and Daniel Litwin
Republic of the Philippines, if legality is only addressed as a jurisdictional issue, the tribunal may “examine the speck in the eye of the investor […] and maybe never address the beam in the eye of the Host State. [read post]