Search for: "BLADES v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
Cir. 1972); State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:36 pm
In today’s case (Arletto v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
In Alonso v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
In a decision published this spring, Davis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
In Alonso v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Norman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
From People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:53 am
In People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
In State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
Despite a consumer survey showing deception, the Second Circuit relied on the fact that the main blade of the knives was marked “STAINLESS/CHINA” and the packaging expressly stated, “Made in China. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 10:40 pm
Humane Soc'y of the U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:09 am
House of Representatives, when the House both moved to dismiss the DOMA case Pedersen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
State courts in Michigan, Delaware, Ohio, and Oregon have likewise concluded that the right to keep and bear arms extends beyond just firearms, protecting stun guns, steak knives, and switch blades. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:41 am
People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:30 am
Need it be a blade, firearm or some other type of weapon? [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:17 am
People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:03 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
” Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
