Search for: "BROWN v. MILLER" Results 221 - 240 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer:  Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC;  Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders:  Clark QC, J Brown;  Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterWe already covered the Designer Skin v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the grant comes from Andrew Pollis at PrawfsBlawg and from Donald Falk and Archis Parasharami at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am by Reuel Schiller
Even if the California courts didn’t wish to go that far (this was, after all, three years before Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Davis asks the now-familiar question whether Miller v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by Don Cruse
STACEY MILLER AND RANDY MILLER, No. 13-1014 Opinion of the Court The most current summary describes this event: Set to be argued on January 14, 2015 This is a claim against a compounding pharmacy based on an antioxidant supplement. [read post]