Search for: "Baxter v. Baxter" Results 221 - 240 of 784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2007, 3:02 pm
With a single vote to spare.Justices Chin, Baxter, and Corrigan vote to overrule Pruneyard. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
And, notwithstanding the harsh language of those foul-mouthed justices on the Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court had never used the term in print.Until Thursday, that is.Justice Baxter pulled the trigger in the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
We agree, and, for the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court's grant of Baxter's motion for summary judgment and REMAND the case for trial. 08a0243p.06 2008/07/03 Jacob v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
We agree, and, for the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court's grant of Baxter's motion for summary judgment and REMAND the case for trial. 08a0243p.06 2008/07/03 Jacob v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
  The latter being Justices Chin, Baxter and Corrigan.The majority opinion is authored by Justice Moreno. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
Justice Baxter, who didn't participate in Wells, is in the majority, but that's not too surprising as well.Different perspectives on anonymous calls, but the result is that, at least in California, they authorize a seizure. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:03 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, JJ. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 12:45 pm by Giorgio Luceri
Dennis Crouch discusses patent claims cancellation and inter partes review (IPR) in the U.S. and comments on the case of Baxter Corp. v. [read post]