Search for: "Best v. Mitchell" Results 221 - 240 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
(For those wanting a fuller reminder of the Dunsmuir analysis, see, for example, a summary by Mitchell Grossell, then a student at Western, here. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) and United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/Q6ve6D (Shannon Kirk) Government eDiscovery Needs and Challenges (Audio) - http://bit.ly/SVlTvu (Allison Stanton) Litigation Holds: Seven Steps For Companies Facing Lawsuits or Investigations - http://bit.ly/WcbAca (Mary Jacoby) TAR Update: Precision, Recall, F-measure & Kleen Products Revisited - http://bit.ly/RR5PJs (Michelle Lange, Ralph Losey) Technology and Tactics7 Master Data Management Project Best Practices… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There was hardly an expenditure for the benefit of religious entities that struck them as concerning, as seen in their plurality in Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
Well, for one, Senator Dexter Mitchell is so obviously based on Joe Biden that Buckley shouldn't score any points for having predicted the existence of Biden---and in the book, Mitchell does not become Vice President. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 8:25 am by Tracy Coenen
The antics of Overstock, Byrne, and paid stalkers Judd Bagley and Mark Mitchell have been documented over and over. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
The court, however, dismissed the employee’s sex discrimination claim, finding it duplicative of his hostile work environment claim (Rachuna v Best Fitness Corp, May 5, 2014, Mitchell, R). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:34 pm by Gideon
An interesting opinion from SCOTUS today, in Turner v. [read post]