Search for: "Board of Education v. A, C & S, INC" Results 221 - 240 of 437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) (Docket Report) District Court S D Florida: Post-judgment rejection of asserted claims during reexam warrants termination of permanent injunction: Flexiteek Americas, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Copyright’s one-size-fits-all model means that, notwithstanding the unique characteristics of any particular form of intellectual expression, the legal rules are applied across the board. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Bonner, No. 06-3350 Sentences for wire fraud, theft of government funds and theft of educational funds are affirmed where restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is not a criminal punishment and does not need to be proven to a jury, and the district court properly relied on intended loss in calculating one defendant's advisory guidelines range. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 5:08 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Jimerson is an A-V rated, board certified lawyer whose practice focuses on business litigation, construction law, banking law and eminent domain law. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 14 conference)   Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney fee… [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Schachtman
  Some may find irony in the CPR’s past criticism of Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  Therefore the Court is not being asked to provide an impermissible advisory opinion. c. [read post]