Search for: "Burlington Northern Santa Fe"
Results 221 - 235
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will conclude its penultimate week of oral argument for the October Term 2013 by hearing an environmental case which poses a question of statutory interpretation that may not be as simple as it first appears. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 and may result in waivers of privilege per Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Confounding in the Lower Courts To some extent, lower courts, especially in the federal court system, got the message: Rule 702 required them to think about the evidence, and to consider threats to validity. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
North America's largest railroad companies have all posted stock price growth during the same period--Union Pacific (131 percent), Norfolk Southern (185 percent), Burlington Northern Santa Fe (257 percent), and Canadian National (154 percent)--though none as pronounced as CSX's share gain. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY; from Fort Bend County; 14th district (14-05-01106-CV, 237 SW3d 355, 06-21-07) (Justice O'Neill not sitting)08-0024 KENNETH HUTH v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am
By Lorene D. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway CompanyState RoundupAL> DECIDED · Defendant wins all/part of 4 Motions in Limine in retaliation/discharge action in Taheri v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
CONFOUNDING Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems faced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
After a long winter, the cherry trees are finally managing to blossom. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
The first edition of “Petitions to Watch” for the October 2008 term features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ opening conference of September 29. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
September 13, 2010, Volume 2, Number 26 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]