Search for: "C. R.C. C." Results 221 - 240 of 314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2014, 9:12 am by MBettman
Key Statute R.C. 2745.01– Liability of employer for intentional tort – intent to injure required – exceptions. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 8:42 am by MBettman
Key Statute and Precedent R.C. 4123.01(C) provides that in order for an employee’s injury to be compensable under the workers’ compensation fund, the injury must be “received in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:12 am by MBettman
Key Statute and Precedent R.C. 4123.01(C) states that injury means any injury, whether caused by external accidental means or accidental in character and result, received in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 11:21 am by MBettman
” Case Syllabus Unvested military retirement benefits earned during marriage fall within the definition of marital property in R.C. 3105.171(A)(3)(a) and must be considered for division under R.C. 3105.171(C). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:15 am by MBettman
R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) The court hearing an appeal under division (A), (B), or (C) of this section shall review the record, including the findings underlying the sentence or modification given by the sentencing court. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:38 am
They stipulated to allegations of abuse, under R.C. 2151.031(C), and dependency, under R.C. 2151.04(D), and received a case plan requiring them to maintain a sober lifestyle, increase their parenting knowledge, and participate in mental health assessments. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:10 am by Brian Hall
The Court rejected Armstrong's statutory construction, noting that "the plain language of R.C. 4123.01(C) and (C)(1) requires that to constitute a compensable injury for purposes of workers' compensation, a psychiatric condition must be causally related to the claimant's compensable physical injury. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:05 am
However, a contractor’s material purchases are not taxable when incorporated into: Real property under a contract with, or that is accepted for ownership by, the United States (including its agencies) or the state of Ohio or a political subdivision thereof; A horticulture or livestock structure for a person engaged in the business of horticulture or producing livestock; A house of public worship or religious education; A building used exclusively for charitable purposes by a charitable… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ashby Donald and others v France (Judgment of 10 January 2013) the Court of Human Rights has, for the first time in a judgment on the merits, clarified that a conviction based on copyright law for illegally reproducing or publicly communicating copyright protected material can be regarded as an interference with the right of freedom of expression and information under Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:01 am by Brian Hall
Judge McMonagle then held, however, that the BWC violated both Ohio Revised Code (R.C.) 4123.29 and 4123.34(C). [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:28 am
“Başlatılan takip işlemi” ifadesi, tamamlanmış işlemlerin önceki Kanuna, yapılmamış işlemlerin yeni Kanuna; tamamlanmamış usûl işlemlerine yeni Kanunun uygulanacağını düzenleyen Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu m. 448’ten farklı olarak başlatılmış ancak henüz sonuçlanmamış işlemlerin ise önceki Kanuna tâbi olacağı… [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:14 am by Jamie LaPlante
R.C. 2745.01 (C) states that the deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard creates a rebuttable presumption that the removal was committed with an intent to injure if an injury occurs as a direct result.L.E. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:46 am by Employment Services
Myers Company (2012-Ohio-5317) that substantially limits the definition of “deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard” necessary to create a rebuttable presumption of intent under Ohio’s Employer Intentional Tort Statute, R.C. 2745.01(C). [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 4:17 am by Charles Rowland
NOTE: If you are nearing the requisite 12 points that will result in a separate license suspension you can attend a TWO POINT CREDIT COURSE as set forth at R.C. 4510.037(C). [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 3:23 pm
In a decision announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that when the state seeks to elevate the level of a current domestic violence charge against a defendant based on that person’s prior conviction(s) for domestic violence: 1) Submitting a judgment entry of conviction from a court journal pursuant to R.C. 2945.75(B)(1) is not the exclusive means by which the state may validly prove a prior conviction. [read post]