Search for: "CLINTON WILLIAMS v. THE STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Valeo, the 1976 decision joined in by such free expression defenders as Justices William J. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:06 am
The findings of the Comptroller’s audit and investigation were referred to Dutchess County District Attorney William V. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Williams and A. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:13 pm
Appointed in 1993 under President Clinton, Justice Ginsburg just recently turned 80. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:54 am
Better BroadcastingCalifornia Appeals Court Says Emails That Don't Identify Sender Violate State Spam Statute – Balsam v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case from 2004, National Archives and Records Administration v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm
You might have thought the case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
But DOMA essentially undoes the uniform definition that existed--one that relied on the state law definition (and expected states to give "Full Faith and Credit" to each others' determination when a person moved from one state to another). [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:30 am
The lecture honors Judge William C. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:03 am
Medellin v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm
SWAMMI, INC. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
