Search for: "COTTON v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
In MR v North Tyneside Council and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Housing and council tax benefits : other) [2015] UKUT 34 (AAC) [Our report], we saw the Upper Tribunal accept the DWP argument on the position of ‘shared care’ families for bedroom tax purposes. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:35 am by Steve Lubet
  Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton evidently wants to insert himself in the Middle East peace process – he has already written to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, so President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi might be next – but the world is much better off if the Razorback state legislature keeps the hell out of it. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm by Sandy Levinson
  So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Cody Poplin
The test is just the latest in the expanding arms race in South Asia, following India’s recent tests of its Agni-IV and Agni-V missiles, which are capable of traveling 2,500 and 3,400 miles respectively. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:44 am
That's the question which was answered in the Sixth Circuit's United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 2:44 am by Matt Kaiser
That’s the question which was answered in the Sixth Circuit’s United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm by Beth Graham
FSB, 235 S.W.3d 185, 193-94 (Tex. 2007); Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am by Jani
The test was phrased well by Justice Brandeis in Kellogg v National Biscuit: "...the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer". [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm by Schachtman
Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm by Giles Peaker
Cotton & Ors, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWHC 3437 (Admin) This was the Liberty backed judicial review of the bedroom tax regulations on the basis that the regulations amounted to an article 8 breach, or an article 14 breach read with article 8, or that the regulations were irrational. [read post]