Search for: "Caps v. Board Members"
Results 221 - 240
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:30 am
Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85, 109, n. 39). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
As reported in the North Jersey News Publication, The Daily Record, Morris County Sheriff Edward V. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am
Matter of Smith v Russo, 230 AD2d 863 [2d Dept 1996]; Matter of Chu v Sino Chemists, 192 AD2d 315 [1st Dept 1993]), and the nature and extent of any intervening changes to the business and/or its value certainly could be considered. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
* Disciplinary authority over the EPO Boards of Appeal: a former member speaksThe EPO saga has been extensively covered by Merpel, who gave the floor to the protests of almost the entirety of the internal members, and many (here and here) of the external members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal against the so-called "house ban" imposed on a member of the Board of Appeal, which were also… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
“It is simply an internal human relations scheme imposed on RCMP members by management. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
Itawamba School Board, supra.When members of the Disciplinary Committee asked Bell about his “intentions” withrespect to the song and whether the violent lyrics reflected an intention to harm the coaches. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
Board and care facilities do not provide skilled nursing care. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:08 am
” International Finance Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
If approved by voters, the charter amendment would create an ethics and anti-corruption policy, require enactment of an ethics code, establish an ethics board, lower the cap on campaign donations, and allow for limited public financing of campaigns. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that, in adopting the Portion Cap Rule, the Board of Health exceeded its regulatory authority and engaged in law-making, thereby infringing upon legislative jurisdiction.Read More: Top state court says NYC can’t ban businesses from selling supersize sugary drinks to customersMcCullen v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
Will the parents be responsible for room and board? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:04 am
The case is Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The trial court agreed and declared the regulation invalid, primarily on the ground that the Board of Health exceeded its authority and violated the separation of powers doctrine as set out by the New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:52 am
Here’s news from Richards Layton (we’ll be posting memos in our “Poison Pills” Practice Area – and here’s a DealBook article on Sotheby’s truce): In Third Point LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
The action removes expenditure caps for all the candidates, and imposes a $300 limit on donations to Shriver. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
Further, the court declined to assume that system board panel members were partial or biased simply because a certain party selected them. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Banks often use a $50 across-the-board cap for both credit cards and debit cards (e.g., Visa and Master Card) and have parallel policies for both. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:01 am
- In general, as market cap increases, so does the likelihood that only certain board members may speak with shareholders and that management's presence is required [read post]
