Search for: "Cherry v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
Currently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering Judge McMahon’s dismissal of Southern Cherry Street LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Video Performance Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) Good news for the UK’s IP law service providers and perhaps for others too (IAM) Two bites at the cherry but not enhanced costs: Wragg v Donnelly (PatLit) United States US General NY Times review ‘Common as Air’: History of IP (Trademark Blog) US Patent Reform RIP Patent Reform 2010? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
Supreme Court "distorts and cherry-picks historical evidence. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm
We are getting close to a quarter of a century since the United States Supreme Court outlined the requirements of gatekeeping, in Daubert v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Criminal abortion bans in the United States date to the late nineteenth century in many states. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
LEXIS 1 (Fl 1/6/2011) Relief denied on claims relating to “(1) this Court‘s interpretation of mental retardation, as set forth in Cherry v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
EEOC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am
As a result, instead of developing local varieties, the wine industry throughout the Soviet Union was also producing champagne, cherry and port wine. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Serbia and Croatia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Covell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
To that end, practices like those espoused in Pentagon policy, requiring autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons systems to undergo “rigorous hardware and software verification and validation (V&V) and realistic system developmental and operational test and evaluation (T&E),” can help reduce the risk of unintended combat engagements. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
Civil forfeiture complaints are governed by the Supplemental Rules in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which state in part that the Government must ”state sufficiently detailed facts to support a reasonable belief that the government will be able to meet its burden of proof at trial. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Burst at *10, *12 cherry picked studies and failed to explain contrary results. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:06 pm
Cherry-picking defense unavailing. [read post]
