Search for: "Columbia Pictures Inc" Results 221 - 240 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The respondent in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
Pulse Electronics, Inc., 14-1513. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The application to dismiss a defamation claim as a Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPP) under s.4 of the Protection of Public Participation Act 2019 was dismissed in Waterton Global Resource Management, Inc. v Bockhold, 2022 BCSC 499 (CanLII). [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
” Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
In a famous example, an agent of Columbia Pictures sent takedown notices for numerous Vimeo uploads—including the short film that originally inspired Columbia’s Pixels movie—simply for having the word “pixels” in their names.[4] The rights of wrongly accused Internet users, and of those who would read or watch their work, suffer as a result. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Sinai Hospital in New York are resulting in a changing of this picture. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
It fails to look at the whole picture and the dynamics at work in it.And as for debt-buyers, they already have to adjust their collection activities state-by-state to comply with different statutes of limitations and differences in state fair debt collection laws, in addition to having to abide by state-specific licensing and bond requirements. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
It fails to look at the whole picture and the dynamics at work in it.And as for debt-buyers, they already have to adjust their collection activities state-by-state to comply with different statutes of limitations and differences in state-enacted fair debt collection laws, in addition to having to abide by state-specific licensing and bond requirements. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
Stevensinvolved a federal law prohibiting possession of pictures depicting animal cruelty. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Indeed, under the 1992 Supreme Court ruling in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]