Search for: "Constitution Party of South Dakota" Results 221 - 240 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Robin E. Shea
*The Eighth Circuit hears appeals from federal district courts in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The political dissonance of having a governor of one party and a supermajority of an opposing party in the Legislature is one of the starkest effects of gerrymandering, revealing how parties cling to evaporating power. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am by fjhinojosa
Peters, Jurisdiction to Tax is not Jurisdiction At All: Understanding Jurisdiction’s Jargon in Light of South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The apparent conflict between Trump’s attacks and his party’s long embrace of the tactic comes as the health crisis has spurred Democrats and civil rights groups to push to loosen restrictions on mail voting in many jurisdictions. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Travis, 941 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir. 1991) (applying Minnesota and South Dakota law); BDO Seidman v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
The state Constitutions of Colorado, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and South Dakota authorize advisory opinions, whereas Alabama and Delaware provide the advisory power through statutes. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Krueger marketed fancaster.com online on a few sports-oriented websites and those of several local pubs but testified that most of Fancaster's marketing efforts had not been geared toward the Internet, but rather had taken place at sporting events, bars, on local television channels in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Sioux City, Iowa, on radio stations in Charleston, South Carolina, and via flyers and handbills. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Locally administered taxes create significant tax complexity, and in some cases, the expansion of these obligations on third-party platforms can raise constitutional concerns. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
A South Dakota ballot question committee challenges these deadlines under the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Governing, Liz Farmer reports that South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
Part II will analyze the Kelo parties’ briefs from a practical perspective and provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s arguments. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Democrats Press General Services Administration Over Trump Hotel Payments Greenwich Time – Jonathan O’Connell, David Fahrenthold, and Joshua Partlow (Washington Post) | Published: 4/24/2020 Congressional Democrats are pressing the General Services Administration for information about President Trump’s District of Columbia hotel lease after Trump’s company said it asked the federal government to include it in any accommodations it may make for private… [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
In a podcast for Law360 (subscription required), Maria Koklanaris discusses South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
John Thune, South Dakota Republican, that the Uighurs were “hardened killers bent on the destruction of the United States,” the brief said that was an absurd statement, given the fact that four Uighurs who had been released and are now living in Bermuda were “now raking sand traps for American golfers in Bermuda, a few hours from Washington. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:43 am by Jim Sedor
South Dakota – After Promising to Replace, Did Lawmakers Deliver on IM22? [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
South Africa North West Premier Supra Mahumapelo has dismissed reports that he has withdrawn his defamation case against the North West Business Forum. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm by Amy Howe
Today the justices announced that they would take on South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:25 am
Consensus, of course, is not required for most government-imposed requirements, but it is relevant either if the common law punishes only clear departures from standard practice or if some constitutional right is implicated. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Arguing that ranked choice voting is too complicated for voters to understand, Democrats in the District of Columbia and Republicans in states such as Idaho, Montana, and South Dakota took steps to prevent adoption of the voting system. [read post]