Search for: "DEFENDER SERVICES v. COOPER" Results 221 - 240 of 1,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
The district court granted summary judgment for Third-party defendants Marsh, finding lack of an actual case or controversy between Marsh and Cooper Tire. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:09 am
He claims that defendants have threatened his business associates with criminal prosecution in order to secure their cooperation in the investigation. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:46 am
 The Defendant never alleged that the goods and services identified in the HIGH TIMES registrations are unlawful. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
As Justice Cooper wrote in Baidoo, “[A] concept should not be rejected simply because it is novel or nontraditional. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 1:20 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCounsel for Habeas Relief Claim Denied; Petition Did Not Address Relevant Elements of 'Cooper'Moultrie v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Providing for the defense and indemnification of public officers and employees named as defendants in certain litigation Scimeca v Brentwood Union Free Sch. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:16 am
Gibson     Subscription Required NASSAU COUNTYCivil Practice Receptionist in 'Cooperative Office' Not Defendant's Employee, Not Authorized to Accept Service of Process Rapport Associates Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Declines to Quash Subpoena Seeking Recordings Of Cooperating Witnesses' Prison Telephone CallsUnited States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:50 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCivil RightsFree With Registration: Panel Revives Retaliation Claims by Workers Who Cooperated in Probe of Supervisor Hicks v. [read post]