Search for: "DOES 1-44"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 1:33 pm
”[6] An open question, however, is: Does the OECD have the staffing required to do this work and can it conceivably be completed by the self-imposed deadline of January 2020? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
ahin v Turkey (2005) 44 EHRR 99, para 152). [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
Cir. 2005); In re Schulze, 346 F.2d 600, 602 (CCPA 1965) ("Argument in the brief does not take the place of evidence in the record. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 12:52 am
Some of the answers he received are as follows--1. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
Publications:Community Members Should be Able to Sponsor Refugees for the Right Reasons, Not to Save the Government Money (The Conversation, March 2019) [text]Community-sponsorship in the UK: Breaking Down Barriers to Diversity (Refugee Hosts Blog, Feb. 2019) [text]Expectations and the Politics of Resettlement: Colombian and Palestinian Refugees in Chile and Brazil (Refugee Hosts Blog, March 2019) [text]Migrants and Refugees are Asked to Integrate: But What Does Integration Actually Mean? [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:26 pm
David Hughes (Univ. of Michigan - Law) has posted Moving from Management to Termination: A Case Study of Prolonged Occupation (Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 44, no. 1, 2018). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Alternatively, making reference to R 44, it can be reasoned that in the light of the teaching of document D2, claim 8 does not contain any special technical features, either of the same or the corresponding type, which could make a contribution over the prior art. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
Chrysler does not deserve aid until it can present compelling new-generation vehicles. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:36 am
What tools does society have to monitor, and perhaps even to regulate, such expression? [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 12:11 pm
That dividend will be assessable income of its resident shareholders under paragraph 44(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936.5 4. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:19 am
It should be borne in mind in that regard that Regulation No 44/2001, apart from a few limited exceptions which are not relevant to the main proceedings, does not authorise the jurisdiction of a court of a Member State to be reviewed by a court in another Member State (Case C? [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:29 am
No. 44. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:29 am
No. 44. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:24 pm
Final ruling: 1. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:10 pm
However, it must be borne in mind that the regulation No 44/2001 does not consider connexity a general head of jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:52 pm
IDEA, § 615(k)(1)(F). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:38 pm
Ziegler (case 1/13). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:15 pm
Cir. 2006); SciMed Life Sys., Inc., 242 F.3d at 1343–44. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
The post If A Tree Falls In The (Urban) Forest … Does CEQA Apply? [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:56 am
J.A. van der Meer qq Arilco Holland BV, the Dutch Supreme Court (HR 12 March 2010, LJN BK4932, 08/04424) referred the following question regarding Art. 45 of the Brussels Regulation to the ECJ (Case C-139/10) Does Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 1 preclude the court with which an appeal is lodged under Article 43 or Article 44 of that regulation from refusing or revoking the declaration of enforceability on a ground, other than one of… [read post]
