Search for: "Daimler AG" Results 221 - 240 of 325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
Even if this Kat were to continue to opt for Mercedes-Benz as the brand he prefers from among the three, he represents the wrong age demographic (and in any event he is not likely to purchase another car in his lifetime). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm by Will Baude
Daimler AG, 727 F.3d 174, 191 (2d Cir. 2013) (“The law of this Circuit already provides answers to some of those questions, including the principle that corporations are not proper defendants under the ATS in light of prevailing customary international law, see Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:44 am by Kimberly Bennett
[JURIST] A French court on Monday ordered a trial for German car maker Daimler AG and French industrial conglomerate Lagardere SCA, shareholders in Airbus' parent European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:08 pm
Patent No. 6,313,749, appeals a district court’s grant of summary judgment of indefiniteness in favor of defendants Mer- cedes-Benz USA, LLC, and Daimler AG (collectively, “Mercedes”)." [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent No.6,313,749, appeals a district court’s grant of summary judgment of indefiniteness in favor of defendants Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC,and Daimler AG(collectively,“Mercedes”). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s oral argument in Daimler AG v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm by Oyez Project
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co Daimler AG v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
  Russell also represented the respondents in Daimler AG. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
The Court heard oral arguments in two other cases yesterday morning:  Daimler AG v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:04 pm by Kali Borkoski
The transcript in Daimler AG v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:12 pm by Cicely Wilson
Daimler AG, US 2nd Cir. (8/21/13)Class Action, Injury Law, International LawPlaintiffs filed putative class-action suits over ten years ago under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), 28 U.S.C. 1350, on behalf of those harmed by the South African legal regime known as “apartheid. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:00 pm by Trey Childress
Daimler AG holding that the Kiobel decision barred a class action against Daimler AG, Ford Motor Company, and IBM Corporation for alleged violations of the law of nations in selling cars and computers to the South African government during the Apartheid era. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm by John Bellinger
 The Justice Department argued that the Ninth Circuit’s 2011 decision finding personal jurisdiction in California over Daimler AG, a German company, for the actions of a subsidiary in Argentina, was “seriously flawed” and contrary to the Supreme Court’s subsequent 2011 decision in Goodyear. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
   This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]