Search for: "Daubert LLC"
Results 221 - 237
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name, was… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
LLC. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:00 am
Id. at *7.Daubert requirements do not apply to a determination of the validity of an ediscovery method. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:27 am
Berk-Tek LLC, 805 F.3d 1064, 1073 (Fed. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
At its Conference on February 21, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as rights of eighteen- to twenty-year-olds under the Second Amendment, police use of nontrivial force against a passively resisting arrestee, Federal Power Act requirements for interstate electric rates, preemption of local ordinances banning renting housing to illegal aliens, and whether hosting poker games is a federal felony. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Preemption, of course, would be The Beatles, and Daubert/Frye the Rolling Stones. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
* The following blog is an adaptation of the presentation Alan Ackerman and Matthew Ackerman gave on “The Fundamentals of Easement Valuation” at the American Law Institute’s Eminent Domain & Land Valuation Litigation Seminar in New Orleans on February 1, 2024. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Rejecting that argument, the court observed: “Defendant severely misrepresents [the agent’s] opinion testimony by briefly summarizing a few lines of testimony while omitting the bulk of the testimony, and bases his argument on the unsupported and conclusory allegation that the testimony was insufficient to satisfy Daubert. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Recently, Bexis attended the DRI drug and device committee spring conference. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
”’ First Time Videos, LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
We at the DDLaw blog wish all our readers a Happy New Year as 2014 recedes inexorably into our rear-view mirror. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, 752 F.3d 82, 89 (1st Cir. 2014) (affirming exclusion of expert witness who failed to account for confounding in event studies), aff’g 853 F. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
These discovery changes therefore do not affect the gatekeeping functions called for by Daubert v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
The Truth About Hedy Lamarr It seems the entire internet recently discovered the Hedy Lamarr patent story. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
