Search for: "David Faires v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Casey, now overruled by Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
As she notes, “authoritarian rulers” are often able to “subvert” ostensibly “constitutional processes and institutions,” but does this simply confirm, as Rosalind Dixon and David Landau have suggested, that illiberally disposed rulers, like Viktor Orbán, can “borrow” the design features of liberal constitutions and turn them to their own nefarious ends? [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:11 am
See, e.g., Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Public Disclosure Commission v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
In overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
FAIR, in which the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment did not give universities the right to exclude military recruiters, and PruneYard Shopping Center v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
He fails to note that the legislative change he thinks would be necessary already occurred in the EU with the introduction of Directive 2004/48/EC while in U.S. patent law it has been accepted since the 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 8:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
In 2007, Christina Romer and David Romer, professors of economics at the University of California Berkeley, conducted a study to determine the impact of legislated tax changes on the economy. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:31 pm
In addition, Steyn J was careful to describe the claim as “legitimate”, stating that “it is neither fair nor apt to characterise this as a SLAPP [Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation]”, and in doing so dismissing claims that the lawsuit was devoid of merit and brought for the primary purpose of silencing, intimidating and ultimately bankrupting Cadwalladr into defeat. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
The 9th states that Concepcion v US, 142 S. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
For me—and perhaps for a good number of other students—active reading involves a fair amount of writing.5. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in McCorvey v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
