Search for: "Davis v. Public Safety "
Results 221 - 240
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
MacDonald(N.S.C.A., May 11, 2012) (34914) Jan. 17, 2014 To determine if a safety search is reasonably necessary, and therefore justifiable, factors must be weighed to balance the police duty against the liberty interest in question, including: 1. importance of the performance of the duty to the public good; 2. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Fordyce v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
Oct. 11, 2011), Davis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
See Glik v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
"The Risk Assessment Guidelines developed by the Board expressly provide that youthful offender adjudications are to be treated as `crimes' for purposes of assessing the defendant's likelihood of re-offending and danger to public safety as held in People v Moore, People v Masters and People v Peterson. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 9:30 pm
In an effort to address the Supreme Court’s 1996 holding in Leavitt v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 pm
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, V. vulnificus bloodstream infections are fatal in about half of cases. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Parke Davis & Co., 520 F.2d 1359, 1362 (4th Cir. 1975). [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:26 pm
There is no danger to public safety in Mr. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:36 am
The Sixth Circuit disagreed, ruling that the bomb should be admitted given the pubic safety exception established by the Supreme Court in New York v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause… [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
” Sarah Klein, a food safety attorney at the Center for Science in the Public Interest told Food Safety News she believes the LFTB fiasco raised transparency concerns. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
The case, Floyd v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
Article I, section 9, clause 2 of the Constitution stated: “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School… [read post]
