Search for: "Decker v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
LED Technologies Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) It’s all fun and games until someone goes to jail – Ugg Boots – trademark and copyright infringement case, contempt of court: Deckers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
LED Technologies Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) It’s all fun and games until someone goes to jail – Ugg Boots – trademark and copyright infringement case, contempt of court: Deckers v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:56 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  A landmark opinion by the late judge Benjamin Cardozo, entitled Palsgraf v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
United States The defamation trial against HBO over a “hoax” child labour report has begun with a statement by the attorney for Mitre Sports International. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
 Ron is best known for the invention sold successfully around the world as the Black & Decker WORKMATE work bench (right). [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Morgan Trowland and Marcus Decker challenged the “extraordinary length” of their sentences, arguing they were unprecedented and disproportionate for non-violent protest. [read post]
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]