Search for: "Democratic Party v. Board of Elections"
Results 221 - 240
of 594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
It has no democratic legitimacy other than that. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 8:21 pm
Citing the Supreme Court of Canada in Baier v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
The Court said so unanimously in Matal v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The leading decision is that of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Davison v Randall (2019) In that case, the Chair of the Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia, Ms. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:23 pm
Similarly, in Kita v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
” Proposed FEC Rule Would Further Constrain Foreign Election Contributions National Public Radio – Philip Ewing | Published: 8/1/2019 The FEC proposed new rules to outlaw exchanges like the one that took place when a Russian delegation visited Trump Tower in 2016 to offer Donald Trump’s campaign “dirt” on Democrats. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:27 am
The conclusion: The 2016 election exposed alarming new vulnerabilities in this country’s democratic processes. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 2:50 pm
Harper v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm
As an aside, this treatment of Bandemer was somewhat surprising given the heated debates about stare decisis seen in this term’s earlier decisions in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Board of Education. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Even as the various investigations of Russian “meddling” in the 2016 election wind down, concerns about the security of the 2020 election abound. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:09 am
It’s obvious why Democrats might get on board. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
But the goal of the Republican politicians who brought the case was flat-out erasure of a despised Democratic president’s signature legislative accomplishment in an election year. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
Judge Mehta’s opinion provides a clear rejection of Trump’s arguments that Congress lacks a legitimate legislative purpose—an argument Trump is making across the board in order to reject oversight attempts by House Democrats. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am
The House Speaker’s stark warning to Democrats—to stay in the center l [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:01 am
Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
