Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 221 - 240 of 2,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Two Recent False Claims Act Coverage Decisions The two recent decisions are Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Summary Plan Description states that it does not constitute a part of the insurance plan or part of the insurance policy.The plaintiff acknowledges that ERISA is not applicable to the subject Sun Life plan as it constitutes a governmental plan exempt from ERISA (see 29 USC §§ 1002[32]; 1003[b][1]; Lyndaker v Board of Educ. of W. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:49 am by Daniel E. Katz
The Court of Appeals, by Judge Read, agreed with the dissenting justices of the Fourth Department, and reversed. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” In other words, said the court, the Moratorium Statute “does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm
In Panasia Estate's first return to the Appellate Division since the Court of Appeals issued its decisions, the First Department, Appellate Division, has now answered that question in the negative, holding that a claim for consequential damages against an insurer does lie absent bad faith. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
  Or do we want, as this court apparently does, insurers to make coverage decisions based only on paperwork they receive? [read post]