Search for: "Disney v. Disney"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
For our purposes, the important facts of Baez v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:47 pm
The 2013-2014 Copyright Review ProcessRelated Cases: Disney v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:46 am
Milne v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:45 pm
– Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657 The case is Keeling v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Wells Fargo, relying on TSC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
In Seybold v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
In Seybold v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Barnes v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
" The answer to the second question appears in Stephen Slesinger, Inc v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
Disney’s Cars was remade in China as the Autobots, unlicensed remake—Disney sued and won. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:48 pm
The district court in Lenz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
Disney has responded to the copyright lawsuit lodged earlier this year in California by the Estate of Michael Jackson (MJJ Productions (et al) v Walt Disney Company and ABC INC). [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 12:45 am
CopyrightThe IP Watchdog has published a request for amici support in relation to Moodsters v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:26 am
Larry Goodwyn, in which CHEAP-HOLIDAY-INN-HOTELS-ACCOMODATIONS.COM was found to fairly describe a third party's use of the HOLIDAY INN mark, but see Disney Enterprise v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Sources: SEC Complaint: SEC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 12:47 pm
Walt Disney World Co., 793 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Pourshian v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:12 am
The Economist on the future of the legal business; Hairpin reversals of fortune in long-running Barbie v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:39 pm
In July 2007 Hollywood Pictures/Disney executed a quitclaim to confirm that Halicki retained the merchandising rights to “Gone in 60 Seconds” and “Eleanor. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
On Thursday, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Disney Enterprises v VidAngel, affirming the district court’s order enjoining VidAngel after it was sued by several studios alleging copyright infringement.1Unless otherwise specified, the quotes in this article come from the decision. [read post]
