Search for: "Doe v. Black et al" Results 221 - 240 of 409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
In 2015, for instance, she spoke at a rally opposing California's new strict school vaccination bill, and was later quoted in the Sacramento Bee (David Siders et al.): When she heard at the vigil that Brown had signed the bill, Kimberly McCauley of Sacramento sat down on the steps and cried. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:01 pm
The latter road is quite interesting in light of the court's examination of pretextual arrests and stops, such as in Whren et al v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
Tex August 4, 2021)(injunction prohibiting use or disclosure of trade secrets does not break causation regarding defendant’s continuing benefit from the misappropriation). [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097 - ADEASee issue description at Public Citizeno SCOTUS docket hereLewis, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
Black, Jr. and Philip Bobbitt, forthcoming from Yale Press in September. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:40 pm by Bexis
Wright, et al (June 7, 2013)(unpublished) and Blake v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
See People v Swint, 225 Mich App 353, 362; 572 NW2d 666 (1997) (upholding MCL 750.224f’s ban on gun possession by felons be¬cause it “[a]rguably” “does not completely foreclose defendant’s consti¬tution¬al right to bear ‘arms,’ i.e., nonfirearm weapons, in defense of himself”). [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Fallout from Cyan: Does the PSLRA Discovery Stay Apply in State Court? [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Cleary, et al., eds., McCormick on Evidence § 209, at 646 & n.1 (3d ed. 1984)( “In and of itself, statistical analysis can never prove that some factor A causes some outcome B. [read post]