Search for: "Does 1-32" Results 221 - 240 of 5,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2019, 5:52 am by David M. Boertje
Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) Bans Private Prisons Assembly Bill 32 was passed on September 11, 2019, by the California State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom on October 11, 2019. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court, (Pace Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2017).Matthew O. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:09 am by WSLL
§ 1-26-512 (LexisNexis 2011), inverse condemnation under article 1, sections 32 and 33 of the Wyoming Constitution, trespass, and ejectment. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Emily Dai
The report details that McCarthy called Miller at about 4:32 p.m. with a plan to re-mission and deploy the DCNG to support the USCP at the Capitol. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 6:43 pm
Update [2008-1-24 22:32:1 by Big Tent Democrat]: J's post is up on the Times' endorsement of Hillary. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:17 am
That could further excite her critics instead of placating them.I don't think you should be checking the box and allowing Harvard to claim to have a Native American professor based on 1/32 or 1/512, but I like that Warren has removed the basis for inferring that she won't get the test because she knows she's been lying. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:32 am
The 32 year gap does not by itself "permit a deviation from the narrow scope of permissible supplementation under FRCP 26(e). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:55 am by Marcel Pemsel
If all essential elements of the shape are functional, it does not matter how aesthetic or unusual they are. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The arguments in relation to section 32(1) to (3) are complex,  Those in relation to section 32(4) are not. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 5:05 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The four judges who dissented held that the arbitrator erred on Question 1. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  CrimR 32(A)(1), which governs the procedure for a court to use in imposing a sentence in a criminal case, isn’t one of them. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
As a result, expanding survivor benefits does not provide an avenue for the federal government to revoke the State’s reverse offset status. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See ’436 patent col. 1 ll. 26–32. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:53 am by Jeremy
’Yesterday the Ninth Chamber of the CJEU ruled thus (with the main message in bold):Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 ... must be interpreted as meaning that a broadcasting organisation does not carry out an act of communication to the public, within the meaning of that provision, when it transmits its programme-carrying signals exclusively to signal distributors without those signals being accessible to the public during, and as a result of that transmission, those… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:23 pm
§ 1125(c)• Count III: Trademark Counterfeiting Under Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]