Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 221 - 240 of 9,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
The court ruled that it has no jurisdiction over the case because it does not present a claim arising under the patent laws. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Dennis Crouch
The Chief writes: A system claim generally covers what the system is, not what the system does. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
The Chief writes: A system claim generally covers what the system is, not what the system does. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 1:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent No. 6,864,796 is directed to patent ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:10 pm
[…] Claim 1 does no more than call on a “computing device,” with basic functionality for comparing stored and input data and rules, to do what doctors do routinely. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:35 am
 Broken down, that's:$35 for the base fine$8 Criminal justice construction fee$9.60 Courthouse construction fee$.40 Forensic laboratory fee$2 Automated fingerprint fee$8 Emergency medical fund fee$8 Emergency medical services fee$4 Emergency medical air transport$20 DNA program fees$10.40 State courthouse construction fees$9.60 Immediate needs construction$7 State surcharge/criminal fee$40 Court operations fee$40 State penalty assessment fee$35 Immediate needs/infraction… [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Sarah Burstein, Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law Over the past few years, I’ve had various people ask me if 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Mohammad Abdullah , Analysing the Role of Shariah Supervisory Boards in Islamic Financial Institutions, (February 1, 2012).Joanie Sompayrac and Victoria Rose Burge, Does the Defense of Marriage Act Prevent the Internal Revenue Service from Treating All 'Married' Couples Equally? [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 11:17 am
As of Jan. 1, the 30-35 million Americans who use a pre-tax Flexible Spending Account (FSA) at work to pay for their family’s basic medical needs face a new government cap of $2,500. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:55 am by Sheppard Mullin
Mar. 1, 2013), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, resolving what had previously been an unsettled issue in the Circuit, held that the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) does not permit a cause of action for “gap-time,” even when an employee has worked overtime, provided that the employee is paid at least minimum wage. [read post]