Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 221 - 240 of 2,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In other words, the power conferred by A 21(1) to the boards of appeal to review decisions shall not be transferred to the appellants. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
"[T]o be considered documentary,' evidence must be unambiguous and of undisputed authenticity" (Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 86; see Cives Corp. v George A. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Leggett”) of noninfringement of claims 1-5 of U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
IRS clarifies, too, that the preventive care safe harbor does not include screening (i.e., testing) for COVID-19, effective as of the date of notice publication (June 23, 2023). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
P1 and P2, respectively, contain partial BRCA2 sequences while P3 does not contain any coding sequence at all. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Philip Thomas
According to Alston, in the 4 1/2 years prior to June 2008 the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed 88% of jury verdicts that favored wronged victims. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The statement by a majority does not equate to unanimous approval by all parties. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:01 pm
Data Collection Objective #1, for instance, was to "confirm [emphasis added] the existence of a dominant culture among Duke undergraduates. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:47 am
"The recommendations include: 1) A mandatory "diversity" course for all Duke students. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A correction pursuant to R 88 1973 should not have been made. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In T 1440/08 [4] the board also held that it had the power to examine an amendment under A 84 in line with other decisions of the existing jurisprudence (see T 472/88; T 420/00; T 681/00), in particular when the combination of granted claims led to an inconsistency between two features of the amended claim 1. [read post]