Search for: "Dolan v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:39 pm by Bexis
 That, in a nutshell, is Dolan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
As Lyle Denniston reported for this blog, yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Steve Hall
The California Supreme Court opinion in People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kevin Russell
Coastal Com., 483 U.S. 825 (1987); Dolan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am by Marissa Miller
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Frank Miniter argues that the Court should hold that warrantless GPS tracking is a violation of the Fourth Amendment in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:54 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), a petition we've been following that asked whether the nexus and "rough proportionality" tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land, has been denied. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court’s interpretation under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and whether the state court’s interpretation of Florida v. [read post]