Search for: "Ely v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
This was the question considered in Lilly v Genentech [2020] EWHC 261 (Pat).The case relates to Taltz, Eli Lilly's biologic drug for psoriasis. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
Finally, this part of the book discusses the impact of the ruling in Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co and how this case has influenced the application of the written description requirement in the US. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm
Holden v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:43 pm
From Mullane v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm
River Birch,Inc., 920 F.3d 958, 964 (5th Cir. 2019); Eli Lilly & Co. v.Hospira, Inc., 933 F.3d 1320, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:54 am
Right of Refusal 10:45- 11:10 AM; 11:15- 11:40 AM; 11:45- 12:10 PM Speakers: Michele Oberholtzer, Director of Tax Foreclosure Prevention, United Community Housing Coalition and Eli Savit, Senior Advisor to Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan Changes in the Detroit Real Estate Market 10:45- 11:10 AM; 11:15- 11:40 AM; 11:45- 12:10 PM Speaker: Joshua Akers, Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban & Regional Studies, University of Michigan-Dearborn … [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Washington Post – Eli Rosenberg | Published: 11/2/2019 The road to the presidential nomination next year is sure to be full of unforeseen twists and potholes as a crowded field of Democratic contenders dukes it out in a volatile political climate. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
“For any state that passes a law that violates the Constitution, and in particular Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:03 am
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
”) Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Bush v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
The referral, but unfortunately not the referred question, has now been answered by the CJEU with its order in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 10:14 am
V. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm
The recent arbitration decision in Acadia University v Acadia University Faculty Association is instructive in this regard. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
The processor uses RISC-V instruction set architecture--open-source design that allows developers to build products “with few intellectual property restrictions. [read post]
