Search for: "Employment Division v. Smith"
Results 221 - 240
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 11:46 am
In the latter case, five justices expressed their disagreement with another regrettable precedent of decades past — Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Matter of Gallante v DiNapoli 2024 NY Slip Op 03370 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Matter of Gallante v DiNapoli 2024 NY Slip Op 03370 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
Sineneng-Smith and Seila v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm
In Employment Division v Smith (the case that gave rise to the law at issue in Boerne), the Court held that Native Americans who ingested peyote sacramentally were not exempt from state drug laws (and could, therefore, be denied unemployment benefits when fired for using peyote.) [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
RFRA was a response to the 1990 Supreme Court decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Court of Claim's ruling. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Tenured teachers and school administrators facing disciplinary action typically have the right to elect the Education Law §3020-a.disciplinary procedure in lieu of a contract disciplinary procedureKilduff v Rochester City Sch. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District 7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District 7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Congress had enacted the RFRA to counteract Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In 1990, in Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-07, 2010).Piero Tozzi, Whither Free Exercise: Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 1:11 pm
They declined to review two other questions that Smith raised in her petition for review: whether requiring Smith to create custom websites for same-sex couples violates the First Amendment’s free exercise clause, and whether the Supreme Court should overrule its 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
