Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 4:50 pm
England v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:05 am
Telemac Cellular v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
The case of OPQ v BJM ([2011] EWHC 1059 (QB)) addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm
In 1986, the Delaware Chancery Court said in Katz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:03 am
Why did the claim in Lee v Brown fail? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:16 am
England, Jr. issued an opinion in Mendez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (“IPEC”), which superseded the Patents County Court for England and Wales in 2013, is acclimatising nicely to its new name, though it has been a few months since the first decision to come from the IPEC (Bocacina Ltd v Boca Cafes Ltd [2013] EWHC 3090 (IPEC)) reached the database of the British and Irish Legal Information Institute BAILII: this decision was reported on by Darren Smyth on the IPKat back in… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:50 pm
Both King Phillip II of Spain, the most powerful ruler in Europe, and Pope Pius V, head of the Catholic Church, actively worked to overthrow Elizabeth and replace her with a Catholic monarch. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:51 pm
Regardless of the outcome, Vardy v Rooney illustrates the extent to which social media has become a liability landmine. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:01 am
Beginning in late 2008, Verizon New England, Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
” Goldman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
Recently in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
There was no doubt that, unless there was a decision of a superior court to the contrary effect, a court in England and Wales could normally be expected to follow a decision of the JCPC, but there was no question of it being bound to do so as a matter of precedent. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
–Long v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
On January 16th, 2008, the Tenth Circuit published its opinion in New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
Thomas Gibson Bowles v Bank of England (1913): A Modern John Hampden? [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:26 am
The Court held that in cases such as this one, where the child is so young that she cannot possibly decide the issue of residency, see England v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
If the answer to (1) is “yes”, is England the proper forum for such a claim in the circumstances of the Conversant proceedings? [read post]
