Search for: "English v. Jones"
Results 221 - 240
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:55 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
Sam Jones, D-Franklin. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
One is Lexiphanes which provides access to the Liddell-Scott-Jones Greek-English Dictionary (1924) and Autenrieth’s (1889) Homeric Lexicon. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
The Ninth Circuit version of Jones is U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:08 am
English. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am
Recent cases concerning defence powers have been based, not on the ambit of the ”forbidden area” ( Marchiori v Environment Agency [2002]), but on the notion that the government’s discretion in such matters is much wider (CND v Prime Minister [2002]; or that courts should be reticent (rather than constitutionally forbidden) to intervene (R v Jones [2006]). [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
For example, will the serious harm test be more onerous than the current need for a tort to be real and substantial, as set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, or the “threshold of seriousness” considered in Cook v Telegraph [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)? [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:46 am
Dow Jones [2005] QB 946, CA. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Jones v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
For this blog, Amy describes the argument “In Plain English. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
” Also at this blog Amy provides a Plain English reaction to the arguments and Tom comments on the advocates. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
The Defendant pleaded justification, and in mid-2010, applied that an order for service out of the jurisdiction be set aside on the grounds, derived from Jameel (Youssef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc. [2005] QB 946, that the Tweet did not constitute a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Let’s talk about those grants in Plain English. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
Jones, 23 Fla. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:43 pm
Jones--the GPS surveillance case. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
Jones, 565 U.S. _____(2012). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:32 am
This is precisely what the Plaintiff, Sandra Jones, did in the Ontario Court of Appeal in Jones v. [read post]
