Search for: "Ex parte Michael Mays." Results 221 - 240 of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This may also help explain the appeal of materiality. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
” Lawyers at the time advised The Sun that a libel action could cost a million pounds and loss was inevitable, in part because the system “rewarded his deliberate targeting of vulnerable victims. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 2:33 am by INFORRM
  The case underlines the danger of deciding to omit evidence as a matter of judgement- in this instance misjudgement – when making an ex parte application to the court. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:45 am by Jamie Williams
The court also stated: To hold that the State may . . . restrain the liberty of individuals it believes to be dangerous, not as punishment for a crime or as part of the care and treatment of the dangerous mentally ill, but as a civil regulatory scheme for the protection of the public, would significantly expand the power of the State [and] require[] a constitutional amendment. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:24 am by Jennifer Rothman
Child-actors may be particularly at risk as parents may sign away the rights to their children's own names and likenesses, rights that the children cannot regain when they turn eighteen. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:17 am
  We explain and defend Congress’s prohibition of slavery in national territories notwithstanding the contrary decision in Dred Scott and Lincoln’s non-enforcement of Chief Justice Taney’s constitutional judgment and order in Ex parte Merryman. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
But no individual is responsible for producing an invention ex nihilo. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:35 am by Joe May
Heart get the city not only to pay for the backdrop of a scene in a television pilot but also have the mayor take part? [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 1:20 pm
Again consider the ex post facto clause: the ratifiers may have cared whether their constituents thought all retrospective laws should be banned, but in considering the text, their concern would have been the likely legal meaning of the phrase, not what their constituents thought the phrase meant. [read post]