Search for: "Faith Baker"
Results 221 - 240
of 579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The employer and employee must engage in a timely, good faith and interactive process to determine effective reasonable accommodations to enable the employee to perform the essential functions of her job. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
” “We hope this apology is received to be genuine and in good faith,” he said. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
I mean only to point out that in Masterpiece there’s even less possibility that anyone would misattribute any views to the business, and that Masterpiece’s services do not require the baker to feign acceptance/celebration of the couple, something might at least arguably be true in a case such as Elane.)It therefore came as something of a surprise, three years later, when the Court requested the record in Masterpiece from the state court, put off decision for… [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:38 pm
My client obtained his drinks in good faith and in reasonable reliance on his friend paying for them. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:38 pm
My client obtained his drinks in good faith and in reasonable reliance on his friend paying for them. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
Phillips serves all customers, but because of his faith, he cannot express every customer’s message. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:20 am
Any burden on the baker’s free speech is incidental and allowed by anti-bias laws, they maintain. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Wouldn’t that mean that businesses could discriminate at will based on faith? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:18 am
That means, she said, that there might only be one or two bakers to provide cakes for same-sex weddings – and a couple could be out of luck if all the available bakers cite religious beliefs as a reason to refuse to make a cake. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am
This time, there’s a tiny wrinkle: Jack Phillips, the religious baker at the center of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, is claiming that that both his freedom to exercise his Christian faith and his right to free speech prevent him from creating a custom-made wedding cake for a married gay couple. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
’ Mr Justice Arnold considered that – on the basis of the case law – the lack of intention to use can be proof of bad faith. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
Approval of the Proposed Consent Judgment would put TSI in an untenable position, subjecting it to two dueling and inconsistent consent orders: (1) the TSI Consent Order to which TSI is a party and which TSI negotiated in good-faith with the Bureau, and (2) the Proposed Consent Judgment between the CFPB and fifteen NCSLT Trusts (“Trusts”), to which TSI is not a party and only learned about on September 18. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
Approval of the Proposed Consent Judgment would put TSI in an untenable position, subjecting it to two dueling and inconsistent consent orders: (1) the TSI Consent Order to which TSI is a party and which TSI negotiated in good-faith with the Bureau, and (2) the Proposed Consent Judgment between the CFPB and fifteen NCSLT Trusts (“Trusts”), to which TSI is not a party and only learned about on September 18. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding, are framing their arguments to “fight for Justice Kennedy’s vote. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding, arguing that “[b]ecause [the baker]’s wedding cakes are custom works of art, the state of Colorado cannot force him to design those cakes to celebrate ideas about marriage that conflict with his faith. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Justice Harlan was dissenting from the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:24 am
Not just the baker, but all vendors are the conduits for the celebrants’ expression. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
It follows then that just as a state could not forbid bakers from baking cakes to celebrate same-sex wedding ceremonies, a state cannot force a baker to bake a cake in order to celebrate one. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:24 am
Consequently, to force a baker to make the cake that always celebrates these rights, obligations and messages is to force expression contrary to his First Amendment rights. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
If Phillips doesn’t have that right, adding faith to the equation does not supply it. [read post]
