Search for: "Farmer v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 1:48 am
iStock_000001565286Medium.jpg Second Circuit concludes the prejudicial use of the defendant's nickname ("Murder") required vacating one murder conviction and related charges, but affirming conviction of a separate murder conviction and related charges based on overwhelming evidence of guilt, in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 4:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Forest County Potawatomi Community (Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
The fact litigation takes time doesn’t mean it isn’t valid – and is certainly no reason for the state or farmers to stop taking action to protect Iowa’s waters. 6. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am by Mike Scarcella
The United States Department of Agriculture helped research the identification of a bank. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  The Court won’t be settling that issue in the case of Horne v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
Regulatory Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”) establishes a program to conserve and manage of fishery resources within 200 nautical miles of the United States coastline. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Under the presumption against extraterritoriality, federal legislation applies only to conduct that occurs within the United States unless Congress affirmatively states that the statute applies to foreign conduct. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:27 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:28 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]