Search for: "Firestone Tire" Results 221 - 240 of 287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
The concept of common general knowledge (CGK) occupies a more prominent position in the UK’s inventive step regime than it does in the European Patent Office's (EPO) problem-and-solutionapproach or the classic U.S. analysis in Graham v John Deere. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am by Bexis
 . according to contemporary scientific principles”); Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 863 P.2d 795, 825 (Cal. 1993) (“clinical value of early detection and diagnosis”). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
”Judge Hacon explained that he would “have to make an assessment of the upper limit of damages to which Mr Lilley would arguably be entitled if he were to prove infringement at trial, and must then decide whether that upper arguable limit warrants the commitment of this court’s resources to Mr Lilley’s claim”.Maximum arguable damagesThe court stated in its judgment that the parties did agree that the damages should be assessed according to the principles laid down in… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Several of us (the Reed Smith side, obviously) recently attended the firm partners’ retreat. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
 In all likelihood, the same thing couldn’t happen again today.Still, for personal and professional reasons we mourn the result because of Bexis’ involvement in winning that issue (the unanimous Supreme Court now says wrongly) in the first such case to be litigated, In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability Litigation, 333 F. 3d 763 (7th Cir. 2003). [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:30 am
Tires Products Liability Litigation, 153 F. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:39 am by Ray Mullman
Remember Ford Motor Company’s exploding Pinto gas tanks and Firestone Tire Company’s exploding radial tires? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm by Erin Miller
Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire Docket: 09-1124 Issue: Whether a party to a multidistrict litigation proceeding conducted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:51 am by Michelle Capezza
  Furthermore, many plans also include certain “Bruch” language (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 863 P.2d 795, 823 (Cal. 1993) (“as a result of a defendant's tortious conduct”); Meyer v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
  A few of these cases include the Ford/Firestone tire defect roll-over cases, and the once popular diet drugs Fen-Phen and Metabolife Class Actions. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:26 pm by John Fullmer
  In the notorious Firestone Tire case, the verdicts were around a measly 30 million. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:03 am by William A. Ruskin
After a five-week trial and four days of deliberations in the trial court, a jury concluded that William Molina – who suffered from a variety of cancers and other ailments -- was not entitled to damages for his alleged exposure to defendants’ solvents during his 17-year career at a Firestone tire plant. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co Limited [1972] RPC 457. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm by McKennon Law Group
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 6:23 am by McKennon Law Group
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]