Search for: "Ford Motor Co., Appeal of" Results 221 - 240 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by Burton A. Padove
While the decedent’s estate insisted the crash was caused by a faulty throttle cable designed and manufactured by Ford Motor Co., jurors ruled the decedent was 100 percent at fault. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:41 pm by Gregory Forman
Ford Motor Co., 354 S.C. 72, 82, 579 S.E.2d 605, 610–11 (2003) (“Contrary to perjury by a witness or a party’s failure to disclose requested materials, conduct which constitutes intrinsic fraud, where an attorney—an officer of the court—suborns perjury or intentionally conceals documents, he or she effectively precludes the opposing party from having his day in court. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:08 am
Ford Spared Liability for Defect in Retrofitted Truck Rear Bumper"Ford Motor Co. is off the hook for a $11.8 million product liability judgment in a crashworthiness suit over a chassis cab's faulty rear bumper safety device. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co., Ltd., et al., No. 17-751 Outdry Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm by Julie Lam
Ford Motor Co, No. 141977, and briefs and oral arguments of the parties having been considered, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated its previous order granting the application for leave, and denied the application. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:03 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
" To put Toyota's potential exposure in context, consider a $368-million verdict against Ford Motor Co., which was blamed in the rollover of an Explorer that rendered a San Diego woman quadriplegic in 2002. [read post]
24 May 2015, 7:16 am by Robert Kreisman
In 2004, a woman was paralyzed when her Ford Explorer rolled over and a jury entered a $369 million verdict against Ford Motor Co. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 11:41 am by K&L Gates
”  Defendants bolstered their argument by citing to In re Ford Motor Co., 345 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2003), a case in which the plaintiff’s request for direct access to Ford’s databases in order to search for additional claims analogous to her own was denied on appeal in the absence of “some condition such as improper conduct on the part of the responding party” and because “the district court failed to state any… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Court of Appeals (Nov. 27, 2018).4 In a short, concise opinion, with a single dissent, the Court held that plaintiffs’ evidence (any exposure, no matter how trivial) in a mesothelioma death case was “insufficient as a matter of law to establish that respondent Ford Motor Co. [read post]