Search for: "Frye v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:27 am
Circuit Court case, Frye v United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
• The ACLU's Amy Fettig condemned the use of solitary confinement in the United States in her testimony to the U.N. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:02 am
Ariel Katz in the first case (CBC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
Bower v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Obviously, in the wake of Citizens United and perhaps more significantly still for business, Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
After a brief discussion of the long-recognized rule of Frye v United States — in that expert testimony must be based on scientific principles or procedures and is admissible only after a principle or procedure has gained general acceptance in its specified field — the court swiftly deconstructed Dr. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
United States, unpublished Sixth Circuit decision regarding prejudice under the Lafler and Frye decisions, that made it onto Doug Berman’s radar at Sentencing Law & Policy. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:52 pm
This is a nonsensical fight that I personally have fought for at least 5 years now, without any direct guidance from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013(D.C.Cir.1923)…The Frye standard….dictates that scientific evidence is only admissible at trial if the methodology or scientific principle upon which the opinion is based is sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” (March 5, 2012) <downloaded on March 25, 2012>. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
