Search for: "Givens v. Smith et al" Results 221 - 240 of 289
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Federal Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:21 pm by MacIsaac
Scheffler et al, 2009 BCSC 731, at para. 35, citing Jordan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:53 am by Joel Beck
Grubman et al., a case brought by a group of former WorldCom, Inc. shareholders against Salomon Smith Barney & Co (Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.) and its financial analyst Jack Grubman. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:57 pm
SunTrust Bank, et al (2D08-1239), the Second District granted a petition for certiorari and reversed a trial court order that required the petitioners submit to DNA testing. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  Once caught, he is given the choice of castration or amputation of his foot. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am by Brannon Denning
A case study, or even data gleaned from briefs filed in school speech cases, would have been helpful to a reader seeking to gauge the size of the costs schools bear as a result of Tinker et al. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
But by granting the motion for rehearing, the Court has given itself more time to think about the issues. 3 Improvident grant: Aggie bonfire case Zachry Construction Corp., et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Hedgers mitigate their risk by transferring it to other investors (normally speculators). [17] Speculators ensure adequate liquidity in the market by taking risky positions that hedgers are not willing to take. [18]  The negative stigma given to derivatives over the years corresponds more to their speculative use rather than to the use of these instruments to hedge. [19] Therefore, the question as to the scope of the duty of directors to use derivatives should revolve around… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
            The negative stigma given to derivatives over the years corresponds more to their speculative use rather than to the use of these instruments to hedge[xix]. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Department of the Interior et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Smith emphasized his choice of a running royalty over a lump-sum payment. [read post]