Search for: "Grand Jury Subpoena v. US" Results 221 - 240 of 548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The dissenting views in the House impeachment report, for example, claim that “the President’s assertion of valid constitutional privileges is being used as a weapon against him,” and that the House’s decision to “rush[] straight to impeachment without engaging the courts to resolve this interbranch dispute” represents “a strategic choice … not an appropriate justification for impeachment. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am by Michael Dreeben
Miller, which rejected a defendant’s motion to suppress his financial-transaction records that had been obtained through a grand jury subpoena issued to his bank. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:25 am by Samantha Scheller
Hayes, which held that reporters have a duty to respond to relevant questions put to them during a grand jury investigation and the First Amendment may not be used as a defense for reporters summoned to testify in court. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:09 am by Scott Bomboy
“The only question before us is whether a state may lawfully demand production by a third party of the President’s personal financial records for use in a grand jury investigation while the President is in office,” wrote Katzmann. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
In 2020, a federal grand jury indicted Kruse for conspiracy and fraud, a total of seven federal felonies. [read post]
11 May 2007, 3:42 pm
If anything, the privilege claim seems stronger when the law firm retains the PR firm.A more recent decision out of the same court, In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated March 24, 2003, 265 F. [read post]
9 May 2015, 7:20 pm by Andrew Crocker
Section 215 also links the scope of the orders it authorizes to that of grand jury subpoenas. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am by Andrew Serwin and Adam Fleisher
United States, the court explained that relevant precedent provides that “a defendant subject to the personal jurisdiction of a subpoena-issuing grand jury could not ‘resist the production of [subpoenaed] documents on the ground that the documents are located abroad. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:57 am by Susan Brenner
Benford was subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury regarding the Government's case against Booker. . . . [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Chris Castle
 It’s just possible that the real downside to Google from allowing General Hood to force the production of the many documents he requested in his subpoena was that those documents–like the 4,000,000 documents Google produced in the drugs grand jury that it jealously guarded from being disclosed in the shareholder case–might have provided fuel to the shareholder lawsuit against Google over the drugs. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
“After reviewing historical and legal precedent, we conclude only that presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non‐privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President,” the Second Circuit held. [read post]
While PACs have been around since the 1940s, they have proliferated since the US Supreme Court released Citizens United v. [read post]