Search for: "Grant v. Long"
Results 221 - 240
of 21,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
In M.C. and J.C. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:49 pm
Trevino, 42 F.4th 487, 504 (5th Cir. 2022) (Oldham, J., diss.), cert. granted, 144 S. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Madison, pointing to “the long record of this Court’s review of the lawfulness of Presidential acts,” such as the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
The long answer involves a fun journey into FDA risk mitigation strategies. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
Concord Music Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:36 am
See, e.g., Memorandum of Law in Support of Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, SEC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
The judgment in the case of Narbutas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am
Instead, it asked the parties to brief whether it could grant relief without holding the evidentiary hearing that the Third Circuit had ordered. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
In future blogs, we will post about the legal challenges to the Final Rule, including the case already filed by ten states in federal court in the 11th Circuit where West Virginia is the lead plaintiff (.. déjà vu West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Adriatic Land 5 Ltd v Long Leaseholders at Hippersley Point (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES – BUILDING SAFETY ACT 2022) (2023) UKUT 271 (LC) On an application by the landlord for dispensation from section 20 consultation requirements, the Upper Tribunal held that the FTT had erred in imposing as a condition of dispensation that the landlord be precluded from putting the costs of the application through the service charge. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:20 am
In Smith v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:01 am
Griggs v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:49 pm
The workshop is funded by an SLSA Impact Grant [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 7:41 am
Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
The courts here, held that Mahr payments are enforceable so long as it meets the statutory requirements of a domestic contract pursuant to 55(1) of the Family Law Act (FLA). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
The courts here, held that Mahr payments are enforceable so long as it meets the statutory requirements of a domestic contract pursuant to 55(1) of the Family Law Act (FLA). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
It also suggests a modest resolution to SEC v. [read post]
