Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2021, 10:03 am
In April 2021, the European Commission released its proposed Regulation Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (the “Regulation”), which would establish rules on the development, placing on the market, and use of artificial intelligence systems (“AI systems”) across the EU. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Yum Brands, Inc., 326 F.Supp.2d 214 (D.N.H.2004); Harmon v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:31 pm
Here is the abstract: In Holder v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:18 pm
Based on this rationale, the district court in Johnson found that it is proper to read both sources of law in pari materia and to harmonize them. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 3:41 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:13 am
Harmonic Design, Inc. 153 F.3d 1318, 1325, 1328-29 (Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Yesterday’s post was at pains to show how the Supreme Court, in Yee v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:50 pm
By Eric Goldman You may recall Rescuecom v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 9:15 am
–Harris v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:20 am
Singh v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:40 am
Harmon, No. 18-10087 (1-10-19). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:48 am
The result of Core Wireless v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:24 am
By the time the Court decided Forsyth County v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:54 am
Harmon of Bailey, Stock & Harmon P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming.Date of Decision: March 7, 2013Facts: Brandon Lee Jensen, the appellant (Father), and Margaret E. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:58 am
Supreme Court Punts on Costco First Sale Copyright CaseUnited States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 6:44 pm
I am surprised to learn that I did not cover the Court of International Trade's classification decision in Alcan Food Packaging v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, the Appellate Division said that in construing a statute, "words must be 'harmonize[d]' and read together to avoid surplusage. [read post]
