Search for: "Harris v. Department of State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2019, 12:29 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court in 1963 handed down the landmark decision known as Gideon v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
According to Weatherspoon, on February 1, 2008, two senior regional attorneys with the OAG, James Jones and Harry Monck, ordered her to report her recent interactions with a district judge. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Maursky v Latham 2023 NY Slip Op 04115 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department seems to be a fair decision, yet doesn’t really say why the court reversed the grant of dismissal. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Daniel Schwartz chimes in on yesterday's hot topic, Thompson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An individual’s domicile and residence distinguishedWeiss v Teachout, 2014 NY Slip Op 05888, Appellate Division, Second Department*A person may have only one domicile at a time but he or she may have many residences simultaneously. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Walter Olson
Minimum wage laws are sentimental legislation with all-too-real effects [Jeffrey Dorfman] “Our Business’s Response to California $2 Minimum Wage Increase” [Coyote, with more on a union angle on minimum wage laws] Some experience from Europe [Steve Hanke, more, Cato overview of minimum wage debate] Connecticut fires state labor department employee who gamed system to get benefits for friend, then reinstates after grievance [Raising Hale] Oldie but goodie:… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Donn Fudo of the Department of the Prosecuting Attorney and Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Strujan v Kaufman & Kahn, LLP  2019 NY Slip Op 00630  Decided on January 30, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department is an example. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although Harris had discussed one section of the brief at length in his letter, he unambiguously stated that he wished to press "all" of the issues he had presented to the Fourth Department, including his affirmative defense claim. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:04 am by SHG
And from law created in 1924 in Carroll v. [read post]