Search for: "Harrison v. Wells" Results 221 - 240 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 7:22 am by Louis Rosen
  He defended penniless petty criminals, notorious Chicago gangsters, controversial labor leaders like Eugene V. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
 The Mail has also agreed to pay substantial libel damages, which Mr Vince has indicated that he intends to donate to charity, as well as legal costs. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am by Tana Fye
Part 3 of my paper on the existing Indian family exception to ICWA.Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 7:37 pm
Generally speaking maintenance work could not be contracted out  while, with certain exceptions, construction work could.In The Harrison County Coal Company v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 11:49 pm
This is the first time any of the Courts of Appeal have resolved this issue, which is must reading for anyone who wants to know why they cannot hear a particular song on demand when streaming music online.The case is Arista Records v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Karuna Nundy
Bangladesh WP 9989 of 2014] by the High Court of Kenya [J Harrison Kinyanjui v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
By chance today I read an interesting article in the current edition of the Society for Computers & Law journal on Bilski v Kappos by Dr Robert Harrison and Jordan S Hatcher, in which they suggest that companies build defensive IP portfolios to use when faced with a challenge of patent infringement from a competitor -- to cross-license or cross-sue. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 7:17 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
Additional Resources: Millinocket couple awarded $1.785M in malpractice trial, Jan. 26, 2016, By Judy Harrison, Bangor Daily News More Blog Entries: Cormier v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Bs Thornton pointed out that in 2020, the High Court had ruled (in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) at [111]) that the failure to provide humanist marriages in England and Wales was discriminatory and the Government could not simply “sit on its hands” and do nothing – to which Lord Ponsonby responded, not unreasonably, that “the previous Government chose not to respond to the Law Commission report, and we… [read post]