Search for: "Honeywell, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
"As to the second argument, Bose contended that this case should be treated exactly like In re Honeywell, Inc., 8 USPQ2d 1600 (TTAB 1988), in which the Board refused to apply claim preclusion vis-a-vis Honeywell's circular thermostat design due to what had "happened in the marketplace" in the seventeen years after registration was refused. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
The lawsuit alleged that Pneumo Abex LLC and Honeywell International Inc. and their corporate predecessors knew of the dangers of asbestos and failed to warn their employees and customers of the hazards. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:33 am
Honeywell Int'l, Inc., No. 06-16324, a treatise on CAFA, and, in particular, its "mass action" provisions. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 4:16 am
The Honeywell International Inc. devices he allegedly sought are for missile guidance and banned for export without permission from the State Department.The complaint says Ghassemi wired $70,000 from a bank in Romania to San Diego to pay for the devices, which were to be sent to Bucharest. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:59 pm
It listed its largest unsecured creditors as Honeywell Nylon LLC, owed $3.2 million; Southern Polymer Inc., owed $1.3 million; and Domo, owed $1.1 million. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:53 am by Editors
Here are the latest featured in-house counsel jobs, courtesy of GoInhouse.com: Litigation Counsel – Confidential, Houston, TX Corporate Counsel – Litigation – Pfizer, New York, NY Assistant General Counsel – Intellectual Property – Honeywell, Danbury, CT Attorney – SEC/Corporate – The Home Depot, Atlanta, GA Senior Counsel – Bank Regulatory – BarkerGilmore, Buffalo, NY Medical Device Counsel – BarkerGilmore, Seattle, WA FDA… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:13 am
  She also faults the majority for finding the amendment not tangentially related to the equivalent in question simply because it relates to the "added" limitation from the dependent claim.More concerning Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:01 pm by Ted Frank
"Owens-Illinois was assessed $40 million in punitive damages and Honeywell International Inc. and Pneumo Abex were assessed $20 million each, even though there were no allegations by the plaintiff in the case that he ever worked for, or was exposed to any asbestos-containing materials made by the three companies. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:52 am by Stephen Pitel
  The best explanation of this view is in Expedition Helicopters Inc. v Honeywell Inc., 2010 ONCA 351 (available here; see in particular para 24). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:18 am by Stefanie Levine
To update our article of June 23rd where we reported requests by Furuno against five Honeywell patents, we note that Furuno has now obtained a stay of the litigation between the two companies involving those patents – the trial judge was not persuaded by Honeywell’s unusual argument that Furuno’s motion, filed six months after Honeywell’s complaint, was “premature. [read post]