Search for: "IN RE HUGHES"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm
It is plain and well established that neither Article 10 rights to freedom of expression nor Article 8 rights to privacy has, as such, precedence over the other (see Re S (a child) [2015] 1 AC 593 [17]). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
In our contribution to the continuing debate on this issue we are re-posting an updated version of this series from last year on the way ahead for privacy law. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm
He noted that the proper method for balancing competing rights and interests is the balancing test set out in Re S [2004] UKHL 47, and he suggested that the following Convention rights were relevant in the circumstances: the defendants Article 10 ECHR right; the rights of SAK’s children and SAK’s wife to receive information under Article 10 ECHR; and the Article 8 ECHR right to respect for private and family life of the claimants, SAK’s grown up children, SAK’s wife… [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
I recently moderated a roundtable discussion by three top patent lawyers to assess the significance and impact of the Aug. 20 en banc decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, In re Seagate Technology. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:13 am
Gamblers at a racetrack owned by Kentucky Downs were able to bet on digital re-enactments of famous horse races. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:24 am
Just in time for the GOP Convention and the real opening of Campaign 2012, Michael Medved has a must-read review of why history --and logic-- aren't smiling on President Obama's re-election chances: The Odds Against... [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
Hughes thinks that TRIPs was a big package, not one-sided, and the overall package brought good and bad. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:21 am
Petraeus interviewed by Hugh Hewitt of all people: HH: Now you’re due to make a report back in September, I don’t know if it’s early, mid or late September, General Petraeus, is that enough time to really get a fix on how the surge is progressing? [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:01 pm
This post originally appeared on the Hugh Stephens Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
But, the EEOC brought this (what I would call) "test case" so they're giving this theory a whirl. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:21 pm
Google has successfully convinced a judge in the tech industry-friendly US District Court of Northern California (covering Silicon Valley naturally) to issue a temporary injunction nullifying the enforceability in the United States of an order from a Canadian provincial court in British Columbia (BC), upheld on appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), to delist from its global search results all references to Datalink Technologies Gateways and its counterfeit product, an internet router called… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
The President of the Supreme Court re-constituted the panel under section 43(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to consist of Lord Briggs, Lord Sales, Lord Leggatt and Lord Thomas. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
In our contribution to the continuing debate on this issue we are re-posting an updated version of this series of posts from last year on the way ahead for privacy law. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
The Court of Appeal therefore found in favour of Mr Merricks, setting aside the CAT’s refusal to grant a CPO and remitting the application back to the CAT for a re-hearing. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am
By Dennis Crouch In re TC Heartland LLC (on mandamus to the Fed Cir. 2015) (read-it: Heartland Mand) An interesting mandamus action was recently filed by the Prof John Duffy and Jim Dabney (both now with Hughes Hubbard) raising the following: Whether 28 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 9:41 am
Things Really Go Off the Tracks First dates are just like job interviews…you’re getting Googled afterwards. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 11:08 am
And we’re right back to the purpose of Twiqbal in the first place. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:03 pm
In re J.F., 2011 D.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:42 pm
Karen Barton, Michael Hughes and I are currently at Franklin Pierce Law Center, in Concord, New Hampshire, working with John Garvey and others on SIMPLE projects. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:16 pm
And if they’re unable to reach a verdict on the remaining charges? [read post]
